Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Palestine: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA annual

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
-65.59 % change on previous year
in 2008
Palestine
75 % change on previous year
in 2008
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
13th
Palestine rank
11th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA annual over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Palestine
-1000100200300197119892008

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 75 % change on previous year against -65.59 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 140.59 % change on previous year.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Palestine ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th and Palestine ranks 11th of 46 groups.

Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 16.56 % change on previous year 35.96 % change on previous year 19.4 % change on previous year Palestine
2000s -2.81 % change on previous year 6.69 % change on previous year 9.5 % change on previous year Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Palestine?
Palestine, at 75 % change on previous year against -65.59 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Palestine?
140.59 % change on previous year, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Palestine?
15 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2008.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Palestine rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th and Palestine ranks 11th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Palestine: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/west-bank-and-gaza/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Palestine: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 6,930 data points, 1970–2009
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.