Hong Kong vs Tanzania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA annual

Hong Kong
-62.5 % change on previous year
in 1996
Tanzania
-63.73 % change on previous year
in 2008
Hong Kong rank
100th
Tanzania rank
103rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA annual over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Tanzania
0200400600800197019892008

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports -62.5 % change on previous year against -63.73 % change on previous year in Tanzania, a difference of 1.23 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 100th and Tanzania ranks 103rd of 170 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 41.42 % change on previous year 16.5 % change on previous year 24.92 % change on previous year Hong Kong
1980s 21.85 % change on previous year 7.3 % change on previous year 14.54 % change on previous year Hong Kong
1990s 82.53 % change on previous year 12.93 % change on previous year 69.6 % change on previous year Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual, Hong Kong or Tanzania?
Hong Kong, at -62.5 % change on previous year against -63.73 % change on previous year in Tanzania as of 1996.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual between Hong Kong and Tanzania?
1.23 % change on previous year, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Tanzania?
25 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong and Tanzania rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
Hong Kong ranks 100th and Tanzania ranks 103rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Tanzania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/hong-kong-sar-china/tanzania/">Hong Kong vs Tanzania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 6,930 data points, 1970–2009
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.