IBRD only vs Macau, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual

IBRD only
-60.28 % change on previous year
in 2008
Macau, China
66.67 % change on previous year
in 1997
IBRD only rank
10th
Macau, China rank
12th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual over time

  • IBRD only
  • Macau, China
-1000100200300197119892008

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 66.67 % change on previous year against -60.28 % change on previous year in IBRD only, a difference of 126.95 % change on previous year.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.1 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Macau, China ahead.

IBRD only ranks 10th and Macau, China ranks 12th of 46 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 10.25 % change on previous year 12.5 % change on previous year 2.25 % change on previous year Macau, China
1990s 27.64 % change on previous year 76.67 % change on previous year 49.02 % change on previous year Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual, IBRD only or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 66.67 % change on previous year against -60.28 % change on previous year in IBRD only as of 1997.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual between IBRD only and Macau, China?
126.95 % change on previous year, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Macau, China?
9 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 1997.
How do IBRD only and Macau, China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
IBRD only ranks 10th and Macau, China ranks 12th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Macau, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ibrd-only/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/ibrd-only/macao-sar-china/">IBRD only vs Macau, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 6,930 data points, 1970–2009
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.