Argentina vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Argentina
1.01 million current US$
in 2008
Malawi
1.00 million current US$
in 2008
Argentina rank
35th
Malawi rank
36th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Argentina
  • Malawi
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196919882008

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 1.01 million current US$ against 1.00 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 10,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 35th and Malawi ranks 36th of 172 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 4 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 360,000 current US$ 80,000 current US$ 280,000 current US$ Argentina
1970s 409,000 current US$ 182,000 current US$ 227,000 current US$ Argentina
1980s 549,000 current US$ 570,000 current US$ 21,000 current US$ Malawi
1990s 1.99 million current US$ 1.55 million current US$ 435,000 current US$ Argentina
2000s 1.76 million current US$ 1.72 million current US$ 37,778 current US$ Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Argentina or Malawi?
Argentina, at 1.01 million current US$ against 1.00 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Argentina and Malawi?
10,000 current US$, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Malawi?
40 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2008.
How do Argentina and Malawi rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Argentina ranks 35th and Malawi ranks 36th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/argentina/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/argentina/malawi/">Argentina vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.