Aruba vs Hong Kong: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Aruba
30,000 current US$
in 1999
Hong Kong
30,000 current US$
in 1996
Aruba rank
162nd
Hong Kong rank
162nd
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Aruba
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Aruba ranks 162nd and Hong Kong ranks 162nd of 172 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 30,000 current US$ | 100,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 22,143 current US$ | 92,857 current US$ | 70,714 current US$ | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Aruba or Hong Kong?
- Aruba, at 30,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Hong Kong as of 1999.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Aruba and Hong Kong?
- 0 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1996.
- How do Aruba and Hong Kong rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- Aruba ranks 162nd and Hong Kong ranks 162nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.