Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Aruba
30,000 current US$
in 1999
Hong Kong, China
30,000 current US$
in 1996
Aruba rank
162nd
Hong Kong, China rank
162nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Aruba
  • Hong Kong, China
050.0k100.0k150.0k196919841999

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Aruba ranks 162nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd of 172 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1980s 30,000 current US$ 100,000 current US$ 70,000 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1990s 22,143 current US$ 92,857 current US$ 70,714 current US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Aruba or Hong Kong, China?
Aruba, at 30,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
0 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
8 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1996.
How do Aruba and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Aruba ranks 162nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/aruba/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/aruba/hong-kong-sar-china/">Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.