Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Bangladesh
810,000 current US$
in 2008
Rwanda
770,000 current US$
in 2008
Bangladesh rank
55th
Rwanda rank
57th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Rwanda
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196919882008

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 810,000 current US$ against 770,000 current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 40,000 current US$.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 37 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Rwanda ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 57th of 172 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 1.16 million current US$ 536,250 current US$ 625,000 current US$ Bangladesh
1980s 3.04 million current US$ 1.07 million current US$ 1.98 million current US$ Bangladesh
1990s 5.31 million current US$ 1.72 million current US$ 3.59 million current US$ Bangladesh
2000s 6.35 million current US$ 2.02 million current US$ 4.33 million current US$ Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Bangladesh or Rwanda?
Bangladesh, at 810,000 current US$ against 770,000 current US$ in Rwanda as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Bangladesh and Rwanda?
40,000 current US$, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Rwanda?
37 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2008.
How do Bangladesh and Rwanda rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Bangladesh ranks 55th and Rwanda ranks 57th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/rwanda/">Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.