Barbados vs Latvia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Barbados
250,000 current US$
in 2008
Latvia
220,000 current US$
in 2004
Barbados rank
131st
Latvia rank
132nd
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Latvia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 250,000 current US$ against 220,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 30,000 current US$.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 131st and Latvia ranks 132nd of 172 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 286,250 current US$ | 218,750 current US$ | 67,500 current US$ | Barbados |
| 2000s | 372,000 current US$ | 258,000 current US$ | 114,000 current US$ | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Barbados or Latvia?
- Barbados, at 250,000 current US$ against 220,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Barbados and Latvia?
- 30,000 current US$, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Barbados and Latvia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 131st and Latvia ranks 132nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.