Brazil vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Brazil
1.53 million current US$
in 2008
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
30.35 million current US$
in 2008
Brazil rank
7th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
8th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Brazil
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M196919882008

How they compare

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 30.35 million current US$ against 1.53 million current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 28.82 million current US$.

That makes Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s figure about 19.8 times Brazil's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 7th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 8th of 172 countries.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1970s 1.22 million current US$ 14.99 million current US$ 13.77 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1980s 1.57 million current US$ 36.05 million current US$ 34.48 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1990s 2.82 million current US$ 63.67 million current US$ 60.85 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2000s 3.47 million current US$ 78.77 million current US$ 75.30 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Brazil or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 30.35 million current US$ against 1.53 million current US$ in Brazil as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Brazil and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
28.82 million current US$, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
39 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2008.
How do Brazil and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Brazil ranks 7th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 8th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Brazil vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.