Burundi vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Burundi
570,000 current US$
in 2008
Eswatini
550,000 current US$
in 2008
Burundi rank
87th
Eswatini rank
90th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Burundi
  • Eswatini
01.0M2.0M3.0M196919882008

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 570,000 current US$ against 550,000 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 20,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 90th of 172 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 230,000 current US$ 50,000 current US$ 180,000 current US$ Burundi
1970s 318,000 current US$ 107,000 current US$ 211,000 current US$ Burundi
1980s 868,000 current US$ 459,000 current US$ 409,000 current US$ Burundi
1990s 1.56 million current US$ 1.09 million current US$ 463,000 current US$ Burundi
2000s 1.83 million current US$ 1.42 million current US$ 412,222 current US$ Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Burundi or Eswatini?
Burundi, at 570,000 current US$ against 550,000 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Burundi and Eswatini?
20,000 current US$, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Eswatini?
40 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2008.
How do Burundi and Eswatini rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Burundi ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 90th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/burundi/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/burundi/eswatini/">Burundi vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.