Chile vs Serbia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Chile
940,000 current US$
in 2008
Serbia
950,000 current US$
in 2008
Chile rank
43rd
Serbia rank
42nd
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 950,000 current US$ against 940,000 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 10,000 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 42nd of 172 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.62 million current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 1.60 million current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 1.44 million current US$ | 716,667 current US$ | 721,111 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Chile or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 950,000 current US$ against 940,000 current US$ in Chile as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Chile and Serbia?
- 10,000 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2008.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- Chile ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 42nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.