China vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

China
2.17 million current US$
in 2008
Zambia
1.63 million current US$
in 2008
China rank
1st
Zambia rank
4th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • China
  • Zambia
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196919882008

How they compare

China currently reports 2.17 million current US$ against 1.63 million current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 540,000 current US$.

That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1979 it was China ahead.

China ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 4th of 172 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 1.74 million current US$ 440,000 current US$ 1.30 million current US$ China
1980s 2.81 million current US$ 1.45 million current US$ 1.35 million current US$ China
1990s 5.67 million current US$ 2.13 million current US$ 3.54 million current US$ China
2000s 6.04 million current US$ 2.48 million current US$ 3.56 million current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, China or Zambia?
China, at 2.17 million current US$ against 1.63 million current US$ in Zambia as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between China and Zambia?
540,000 current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zambia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2008.
How do China and Zambia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
China ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 4th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/china/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/china/zambia/">China vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.