Cuba vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Cuba
1.37 million current US$
in 2008
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
14.23 million current US$
in 2008
Cuba rank
13th
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
13th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Cuba
  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196919882008

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 14.23 million current US$ against 1.37 million current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 12.86 million current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 10.4 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Cuba ranks 13th and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 13th of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1970s 364,000 current US$ 285,000 current US$ 79,000 current US$ Cuba
1980s 1.03 million current US$ 876,000 current US$ 156,000 current US$ Cuba
1990s 2.00 million current US$ 8.36 million current US$ 6.36 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 1.56 million current US$ 15.25 million current US$ 13.69 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Cuba or Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), at 14.23 million current US$ against 1.37 million current US$ in Cuba as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Cuba and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
12.86 million current US$, with Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
39 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2008.
How do Cuba and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Cuba ranks 13th and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 13th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/cuba/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/cuba/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Cuba vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.