East Asia & Pacific vs Uganda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

East Asia & Pacific
0 current US$
in 2023
Uganda
1.07 million current US$
in 2008
East Asia & Pacific rank
29th
Uganda rank
27th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Uganda
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M196919962023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 1.07 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 1.07 million current US$.

Across all 40 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 29th and Uganda ranks 27th of 47 groups.

East Asia & Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 4.73 million current US$ 250,000 current US$ 4.48 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1970s 9.53 million current US$ 431,000 current US$ 9.09 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1980s 22.83 million current US$ 1.03 million current US$ 21.80 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1990s 49.51 million current US$ 2.12 million current US$ 47.39 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2000s 62.89 million current US$ 2.60 million current US$ 60.29 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, East Asia & Pacific or Uganda?
Uganda, at 1.07 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in East Asia & Pacific as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between East Asia & Pacific and Uganda?
1.07 million current US$, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Uganda?
40 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2008.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Uganda rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 29th and Uganda ranks 27th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Uganda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific/uganda/">East Asia & Pacific vs Uganda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.