Estonia vs Gambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Estonia
280,000 current US$
in 2004
Gambia
260,000 current US$
in 2008
Estonia rank
126th
Gambia rank
129th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Estonia
- Gambia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 280,000 current US$ against 260,000 current US$ in Gambia, a difference of 20,000 current US$.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 126th and Gambia ranks 129th of 172 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 213,750 current US$ | 1.35 million current US$ | 1.14 million current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 260,000 current US$ | 1.81 million current US$ | 1.55 million current US$ | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Estonia or Gambia?
- Estonia, at 280,000 current US$ against 260,000 current US$ in Gambia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Estonia and Gambia?
- 20,000 current US$, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Gambia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Gambia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- Estonia ranks 126th and Gambia ranks 129th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.