Eswatini vs Panama: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Eswatini
550,000 current US$
in 2008
Panama
520,000 current US$
in 2008
Eswatini rank
90th
Panama rank
93rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Eswatini
  • Panama
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196919882008

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 550,000 current US$ against 520,000 current US$ in Panama, a difference of 30,000 current US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Panama ahead.

Eswatini ranks 90th and Panama ranks 93rd of 172 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 50,000 current US$ 80,000 current US$ 30,000 current US$ Panama
1970s 107,000 current US$ 256,000 current US$ 149,000 current US$ Panama
1980s 459,000 current US$ 638,000 current US$ 179,000 current US$ Panama
1990s 1.09 million current US$ 1.05 million current US$ 43,000 current US$ Eswatini
2000s 1.42 million current US$ 906,667 current US$ 511,111 current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Eswatini or Panama?
Eswatini, at 550,000 current US$ against 520,000 current US$ in Panama as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Eswatini and Panama?
30,000 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Panama?
40 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2008.
How do Eswatini and Panama rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Eswatini ranks 90th and Panama ranks 93rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Panama: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/eswatini/panama/">Eswatini vs Panama: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.