Gambia vs Latvia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Gambia
260,000 current US$
in 2008
Latvia
220,000 current US$
in 2004
Gambia rank
129th
Latvia rank
132nd
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Gambia
- Latvia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 260,000 current US$ against 220,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 40,000 current US$.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 129th and Latvia ranks 132nd of 172 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.35 million current US$ | 218,750 current US$ | 1.14 million current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 1.81 million current US$ | 258,000 current US$ | 1.55 million current US$ | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Gambia or Latvia?
- Gambia, at 260,000 current US$ against 220,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Gambia and Latvia?
- 40,000 current US$, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Gambia and Latvia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- Gambia ranks 129th and Latvia ranks 132nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.