Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Viet Nam: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
30.35 million current US$
in 2008
Viet Nam
1.54 million current US$
in 2008
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
8th
Viet Nam rank
6th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Viet Nam
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M196919882008

How they compare

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 30.35 million current US$ against 1.54 million current US$ in Viet Nam, a difference of 28.81 million current US$.

That makes Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s figure about 19.7 times Viet Nam's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 8th and Viet Nam ranks 6th of 47 groups.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1970s 14.99 million current US$ 1.11 million current US$ 13.88 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1980s 36.05 million current US$ 2.32 million current US$ 33.73 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1990s 63.67 million current US$ 3.63 million current US$ 60.03 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2000s 78.77 million current US$ 4.21 million current US$ 74.56 million current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Viet Nam?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 30.35 million current US$ against 1.54 million current US$ in Viet Nam as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Viet Nam?
28.81 million current US$, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Viet Nam?
39 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2008.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Viet Nam rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 8th and Viet Nam ranks 6th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Viet Nam: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/viet-nam/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Viet Nam: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.