Hong Kong, China vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Hong Kong, China
30,000 current US$
in 1996
Tuvalu
30,000 current US$
in 2008
Hong Kong, China rank
162nd
Tuvalu rank
162nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Tuvalu
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196919882008

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 30,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Tuvalu ranks 162nd of 172 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 60,000 current US$ 26,000 current US$ 34,000 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1980s 59,500 current US$ 17,500 current US$ 42,000 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1990s 92,857 current US$ 77,143 current US$ 15,714 current US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Hong Kong, China or Tuvalu?
Hong Kong, China, at 30,000 current US$ against 30,000 current US$ in Tuvalu as of 1996.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Hong Kong, China and Tuvalu?
0 current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Tuvalu?
22 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Tuvalu rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Hong Kong, China ranks 162nd and Tuvalu ranks 162nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/tuvalu/">Hong Kong, China vs Tuvalu: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.