Jamaica vs Lithuania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Jamaica
340,000 current US$
in 2008
Lithuania
330,000 current US$
in 2004
Jamaica rank
117th
Lithuania rank
120th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Jamaica
- Lithuania
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 340,000 current US$ against 330,000 current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 10,000 current US$.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 117th and Lithuania ranks 120th of 172 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.30 million current US$ | 363,750 current US$ | 933,750 current US$ | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 1.53 million current US$ | 370,000 current US$ | 1.16 million current US$ | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Jamaica or Lithuania?
- Jamaica, at 340,000 current US$ against 330,000 current US$ in Lithuania as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Jamaica and Lithuania?
- 10,000 current US$, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Lithuania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Jamaica and Lithuania rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- Jamaica ranks 117th and Lithuania ranks 120th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.