Latvia vs Malta: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Latvia
220,000 current US$
in 2004
Malta
260,000 current US$
in 2002
Latvia rank
132nd
Malta rank
129th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Latvia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 260,000 current US$ against 220,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 40,000 current US$.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malta ahead.
Latvia ranks 132nd and Malta ranks 129th of 172 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 218,750 current US$ | 142,500 current US$ | 76,250 current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 286,667 current US$ | 193,333 current US$ | 93,333 current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Latvia or Malta?
- Malta, at 260,000 current US$ against 220,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2002.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Latvia and Malta?
- 40,000 current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2002.
- How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- Latvia ranks 132nd and Malta ranks 129th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.