Lesotho vs Romania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Lesotho
640,000 current US$
in 2008
Romania
660,000 current US$
in 2004
Lesotho rank
78th
Romania rank
76th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Lesotho
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 660,000 current US$ against 640,000 current US$ in Lesotho, a difference of 20,000 current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 78th and Romania ranks 76th of 172 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.29 million current US$ | 1.00 million current US$ | 292,000 current US$ | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 1.22 million current US$ | 806,000 current US$ | 412,000 current US$ | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Lesotho or Romania?
- Romania, at 660,000 current US$ against 640,000 current US$ in Lesotho as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Lesotho and Romania?
- 20,000 current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Lesotho and Romania rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- Lesotho ranks 78th and Romania ranks 76th of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.