Macau, China vs New Caledonia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Macau, China
20,000 current US$
in 1999
New Caledonia
20,000 current US$
in 1999
Macau, China rank
168th
New Caledonia rank
168th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Macau, China
  • New Caledonia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197219851999

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1985 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Macau, China ranks 168th and New Caledonia ranks 168th of 172 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1980s 28,000 current US$ 18,000 current US$ 10,000 current US$ Macau, China
1990s 29,500 current US$ 36,000 current US$ 6,500 current US$ New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Macau, China or New Caledonia?
Macau, China, at 20,000 current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in New Caledonia as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Macau, China and New Caledonia?
0 current US$, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and New Caledonia?
15 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1999.
How do Macau, China and New Caledonia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Macau, China ranks 168th and New Caledonia ranks 168th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs New Caledonia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/macao-sar-china/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/macao-sar-china/new-caledonia/">Macau, China vs New Caledonia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.