Panama vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Panama
520,000 current US$
in 2008
Zimbabwe
540,000 current US$
in 2008
Panama rank
93rd
Zimbabwe rank
92nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
01.0M2.0M3.0M196919882008

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 540,000 current US$ against 520,000 current US$ in Panama, a difference of 20,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 93rd and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 190,000 current US$ 20,000 current US$ 170,000 current US$ Panama
1980s 638,000 current US$ 872,000 current US$ 234,000 current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 1.05 million current US$ 1.66 million current US$ 608,000 current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 906,667 current US$ 2.01 million current US$ 1.10 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 540,000 current US$ against 520,000 current US$ in Panama as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Panama and Zimbabwe?
20,000 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
30 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2008.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Panama ranks 93rd and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.