Sao Tome and Principe vs Slovenia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled

Sao Tome and Principe
200,000 current US$
in 2008
Slovenia
210,000 current US$
in 2002
Sao Tome and Principe rank
134th
Slovenia rank
133rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Slovenia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M197619922008

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 210,000 current US$ against 200,000 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 10,000 current US$.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 134th and Slovenia ranks 133rd of 172 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.03 million current US$ 375,000 current US$ 656,667 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 1.08 million current US$ 310,000 current US$ 770,000 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, Sao Tome and Principe or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 210,000 current US$ against 200,000 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2002.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between Sao Tome and Principe and Slovenia?
10,000 current US$, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Slovenia?
9 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2002.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Slovenia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 134th and Slovenia ranks 133rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Slovenia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/sao-tome-and-principe/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-gaps-filled/sao-tome-and-principe/slovenia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Slovenia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,636 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.