East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled
East Timor
510,000 current US$
in 2008
Zimbabwe
540,000 current US$
in 2008
East Timor rank
94th
Zimbabwe rank
92nd
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- East Timor
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 540,000 current US$ against 510,000 current US$ in East Timor, a difference of 30,000 current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
East Timor ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 172 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled, East Timor or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 540,000 current US$ against 510,000 current US$ in East Timor as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled between East Timor and Zimbabwe?
- 30,000 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2008.
- How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), gaps filled?
- East Timor ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.