Chad vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita

Chad
0.0436 current US$ per person
in 2008
Zimbabwe
0.0417 current US$ per person
in 2008
Chad rank
119th
Zimbabwe rank
121st

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita over time

  • Chad
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.4196919882008

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0436 current US$ per person against 0.0417 current US$ per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0019 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 172 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0462 current US$ per person 0.0036 current US$ per person 0.0426 current US$ per person Chad
1980s 0.1678 current US$ per person 0.0991 current US$ per person 0.0687 current US$ per person Chad
1990s 0.2236 current US$ per person 0.1542 current US$ per person 0.0694 current US$ per person Chad
2000s 0.2227 current US$ per person 0.1631 current US$ per person 0.0596 current US$ per person Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita, Chad or Zimbabwe?
Chad, at 0.0436 current US$ per person against 0.0417 current US$ per person in Zimbabwe as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita between Chad and Zimbabwe?
0.0019 current US$ per person, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zimbabwe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2008.
How do Chad and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita?
Chad ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/chad/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/chad/zimbabwe/">Chad vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,561 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.