Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita

Chile
0.0558 current US$ per person
in 2008
Equatorial Guinea
0.0553 current US$ per person
in 2008
Chile rank
107th
Equatorial Guinea rank
108th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita over time

  • Chile
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.511.52196919882008

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0558 current US$ per person against 0.0553 current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0005 current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Chile ranks 107th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 108th of 172 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0325 current US$ per person 0.2604 current US$ per person 0.228 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0634 current US$ per person 1.19 current US$ per person 1.13 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.1162 current US$ per person 1.42 current US$ per person 1.31 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.089 current US$ per person 1.32 current US$ per person 1.23 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita, Chile or Equatorial Guinea?
Chile, at 0.0558 current US$ per person against 0.0553 current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita between Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0005 current US$ per person, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Equatorial Guinea?
34 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2008.
How do Chile and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita?
Chile ranks 107th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 108th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/chile/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/chile/equatorial-guinea/">Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,561 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.