East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0 current US$ per person
in 2023
Eswatini
0.5009 current US$ per person
in 2008
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
29th
Eswatini rank
26th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Eswatini
00.511.52196919962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.5009 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.5009 current US$ per person.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 29th and Eswatini ranks 26th of 47 groups.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0036 current US$ per person 0.1163 current US$ per person 0.1127 current US$ per person Eswatini
1970s 0.0077 current US$ per person 0.203 current US$ per person 0.1954 current US$ per person Eswatini
1980s 0.0154 current US$ per person 0.64 current US$ per person 0.6246 current US$ per person Eswatini
1990s 0.0289 current US$ per person 1.12 current US$ per person 1.09 current US$ per person Eswatini
2000s 0.0342 current US$ per person 1.27 current US$ per person 1.24 current US$ per person Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.5009 current US$ per person against 0 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Eswatini?
0.5009 current US$ per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Eswatini?
39 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2008.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Eswatini rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 29th and Eswatini ranks 26th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/eswatini/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,561 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.