Least developed countries vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita

Least developed countries
0.0388 current US$ per person
in 2008
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2.26 current US$ per person
in 1999
Least developed countries rank
11th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
12th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
0246197019892008

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 2.26 current US$ per person against 0.0388 current US$ per person in Least developed countries, a difference of 2.22 current US$ per person.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 58.3 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 11th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 12th of 47 groups.

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0615 current US$ per person 2.67 current US$ per person 2.61 current US$ per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
1980s 0.1047 current US$ per person 1.07 current US$ per person 0.9642 current US$ per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
1990s 0.1327 current US$ per person 2.64 current US$ per person 2.51 current US$ per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita, Least developed countries or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 2.26 current US$ per person against 0.0388 current US$ per person in Least developed countries as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita between Least developed countries and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
2.22 current US$ per person, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
25 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 1999.
How do Least developed countries and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita?
Least developed countries ranks 11th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 12th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/least-developed-countries-un-classification/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/least-developed-countries-un-classification/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Least developed countries vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,561 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.