Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita

Sao Tome and Principe
1.15 current US$ per person
in 2008
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2.26 current US$ per person
in 1999
Sao Tome and Principe rank
15th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
12th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
02.557.51012.5197419912008

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 2.26 current US$ per person against 1.15 current US$ per person in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.11 current US$ per person.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 2.0 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 15th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 12th of 172 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 2 and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
1970s 2.2 current US$ per person 2.87 current US$ per person 0.6719 current US$ per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
1980s 4.42 current US$ per person 1.07 current US$ per person 3.35 current US$ per person Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 6.65 current US$ per person 2.64 current US$ per person 4.01 current US$ per person Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita, Sao Tome and Principe or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 2.26 current US$ per person against 1.15 current US$ per person in Sao Tome and Principe as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita between Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
1.11 current US$ per person, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
23 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 1999.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per capita?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 15th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 12th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/sao-tome-and-principe/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-capita/sao-tome-and-principe/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
219 places, 7,561 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.