Angola vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square

Angola
0.6176 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Democratic Republic of Congo
0.5778 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Angola rank
143rd
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
146th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time

  • Angola
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
0123196919882008

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.6176 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5778 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.0398 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Angola ranks 143rd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 146th of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1444 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4521 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3077 current US$ per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 0.5888 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4658 current US$ per square kilometre 0.123 current US$ per square kilometre Angola
1990s 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8032 current US$ per square kilometre 0.335 current US$ per square kilometre Angola
2000s 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre 0.462 current US$ per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Angola or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Angola, at 0.6176 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5778 current US$ per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Angola and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0.0398 current US$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Democratic Republic of Congo?
32 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2008.
How do Angola and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Angola ranks 143rd and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 146th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/congo-dem-rep/">Angola vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.