Aruba vs IBRD only: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Aruba
166.67 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
IBRD only
0.6475 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Aruba rank
19th
IBRD only rank
22nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Aruba
  • IBRD only
0100200300197019892008

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.6475 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 166.02 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 257.4 times IBRD only's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 19th and IBRD only ranks 22nd of 169 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba IBRD only Difference Ahead
1980s 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre 165.36 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 145.83 current US$ per square kilometre 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre 144.59 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Aruba or IBRD only?
Aruba, at 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.6475 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Aruba and IBRD only?
166.02 current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and IBRD only?
9 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1999.
How do Aruba and IBRD only rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Aruba ranks 19th and IBRD only ranks 22nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs IBRD only: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/ibrd-only/">Aruba vs IBRD only: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.