Aruba vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Aruba
166.67 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Sao Tome and Principe
208.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Aruba rank
19th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
17th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Aruba
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197619922008

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 208.33 current US$ per square kilometre against 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 41.66 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 19th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 17th of 169 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre 645.83 current US$ per square kilometre 479.17 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 145.83 current US$ per square kilometre 785.16 current US$ per square kilometre 639.32 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Aruba or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 208.33 current US$ per square kilometre against 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Aruba and Sao Tome and Principe?
41.66 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Sao Tome and Principe?
9 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1999.
How do Aruba and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Aruba ranks 19th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 17th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/sao-tome-and-principe/">Aruba vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.