Aruba vs Saint Lucia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Aruba
166.67 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Saint Lucia
163.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Aruba rank
19th
Saint Lucia rank
20th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Aruba
  • Saint Lucia
0200400600198019942008

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 163.93 current US$ per square kilometre in Saint Lucia, a difference of 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 19th and Saint Lucia ranks 20th of 169 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1980s 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre 163.93 current US$ per square kilometre 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 145.83 current US$ per square kilometre 325.82 current US$ per square kilometre 179.99 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Aruba or Saint Lucia?
Aruba, at 166.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 163.93 current US$ per square kilometre in Saint Lucia as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Aruba and Saint Lucia?
2.74 current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Saint Lucia?
9 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 1999.
How do Aruba and Saint Lucia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Aruba ranks 19th and Saint Lucia ranks 20th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Saint Lucia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/st-lucia/">Aruba vs Saint Lucia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.