Bahamas vs Cape Verde: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Bahamas
78.92 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
Cape Verde
84.37 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Bahamas rank
26th
Cape Verde rank
25th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Bahamas
  • Cape Verde
0100200300400500197319902008

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 84.37 current US$ per square kilometre against 78.92 current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 5.45 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 26th and Cape Verde ranks 25th of 169 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1970s 6.99 current US$ per square kilometre 81.39 current US$ per square kilometre 74.4 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 17.78 current US$ per square kilometre 131.02 current US$ per square kilometre 113.24 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 46.45 current US$ per square kilometre 328.37 current US$ per square kilometre 281.92 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Bahamas or Cape Verde?
Cape Verde, at 84.37 current US$ per square kilometre against 78.92 current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Bahamas and Cape Verde?
5.45 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Cape Verde?
21 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1995.
How do Bahamas and Cape Verde rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Bahamas ranks 26th and Cape Verde ranks 25th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Cape Verde: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/cabo-verde/">Bahamas vs Cape Verde: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.