Barbados vs Singapore: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Barbados
581.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Singapore
865.67 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
Barbados rank
11th
Singapore rank
8th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Barbados
  • Singapore
05001.0k1.5k196919882008

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 865.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 581.39 current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 284.28 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.5 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Singapore ahead.

Barbados ranks 11th and Singapore ranks 8th of 169 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre 283.58 current US$ per square kilometre 213.81 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 155.81 current US$ per square kilometre 338.81 current US$ per square kilometre 182.99 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 376.74 current US$ per square kilometre 428.36 current US$ per square kilometre 51.61 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 468.99 current US$ per square kilometre 641.79 current US$ per square kilometre 172.8 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Barbados or Singapore?
Singapore, at 865.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 581.39 current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 1995.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Barbados and Singapore?
284.28 current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Singapore?
27 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 1995.
How do Barbados and Singapore rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Barbados ranks 11th and Singapore ranks 8th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Singapore: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/singapore/">Barbados vs Singapore: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.