Bhutan vs Botswana: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Bhutan
0.7871 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Botswana
0.7764 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Bhutan rank
137th
Botswana rank
138th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Bhutan
  • Botswana
0204060196919882008

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.7871 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7764 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0107 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 137th and Botswana ranks 138th of 169 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Botswana Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5351 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1323 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4027 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 8.39 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9038 current US$ per square kilometre 7.49 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 30.72 current US$ per square kilometre 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre 28.97 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 37.66 current US$ per square kilometre 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre 35.23 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Bhutan or Botswana?
Bhutan, at 0.7871 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7764 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Bhutan and Botswana?
0.0107 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Botswana?
32 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2008.
How do Bhutan and Botswana rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Bhutan ranks 137th and Botswana ranks 138th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Botswana: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/botswana/">Bhutan vs Botswana: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.