Bhutan vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Bhutan
0.7871 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Namibia
0.826 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Bhutan rank
137th
Namibia rank
135th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Bhutan
  • Namibia
0204060197419912008

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.826 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7871 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0389 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 135th of 169 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 11.99 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3917 current US$ per square kilometre 11.59 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 30.72 current US$ per square kilometre 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre 28.83 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 37.66 current US$ per square kilometre 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre 35.68 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Bhutan or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.826 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7871 current US$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Bhutan and Namibia?
0.0389 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Namibia?
23 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2008.
How do Bhutan and Namibia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Bhutan ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 135th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/namibia/">Bhutan vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.