British Virgin Islands vs Pre-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

British Virgin Islands
266.67 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Pre-demographic dividend
1.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
British Virgin Islands rank
16th
Pre-demographic dividend rank
14th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • British Virgin Islands
  • Pre-demographic dividend
0200400600197019892008

How they compare

British Virgin Islands currently reports 266.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 265.1 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes British Virgin Islands's figure about 170.1 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1987 it was British Virgin Islands ahead.

British Virgin Islands ranks 16th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 169 countries.

British Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade British Virgin Islands Pre-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1980s 200 current US$ per square kilometre 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre 197.36 current US$ per square kilometre British Virgin Islands
1990s 214.81 current US$ per square kilometre 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre 211.69 current US$ per square kilometre British Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, British Virgin Islands or Pre-demographic dividend?
British Virgin Islands, at 266.67 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Pre-demographic dividend as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between British Virgin Islands and Pre-demographic dividend?
265.1 current US$ per square kilometre, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Pre-demographic dividend?
10 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 1999.
How do British Virgin Islands and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
British Virgin Islands ranks 16th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 14th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs Pre-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/british-virgin-islands/pre-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/british-virgin-islands/pre-demographic-dividend/">British Virgin Islands vs Pre-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.