Costa Rica vs Korea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square

Costa Rica
14.49 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Korea
14.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Costa Rica rank
54th
Korea rank
53rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Korea
010203040196919882008

How they compare

Korea currently reports 14.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.49 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.13 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Korea ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 54th and Korea ranks 53rd of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Korea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre Korea
1970s 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6213 current US$ per square kilometre Korea
1980s 10.75 current US$ per square kilometre 11.87 current US$ per square kilometre 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre Korea
1990s 25.28 current US$ per square kilometre 15.44 current US$ per square kilometre 9.85 current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Costa Rica or Korea?
Korea, at 14.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 14.49 current US$ per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 1999.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Costa Rica and Korea?
0.13 current US$ per square kilometre, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Korea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 1999.
How do Costa Rica and Korea rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Costa Rica ranks 54th and Korea ranks 53rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Korea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/korea-rep/">Costa Rica vs Korea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.