Cyprus vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Cyprus
32.47 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Eswatini
31.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Cyprus rank
37th
Eswatini rank
38th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Cyprus
  • Eswatini
0255075100125196919882008

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 32.47 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.98 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.49 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 37th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre 2.91 current US$ per square kilometre 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1970s 21.43 current US$ per square kilometre 6.22 current US$ per square kilometre 15.21 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 42.53 current US$ per square kilometre 26.69 current US$ per square kilometre 15.85 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 58.13 current US$ per square kilometre 65.61 current US$ per square kilometre 7.48 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Cyprus or Eswatini?
Cyprus, at 32.47 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.98 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 1996.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Cyprus and Eswatini?
0.49 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Eswatini?
28 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 1996.
How do Cyprus and Eswatini rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Cyprus ranks 37th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/eswatini/">Cyprus vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.