Czechia vs Lithuania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Czechia
4.92 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Lithuania
5.26 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Czechia rank
92nd
Lithuania rank
90th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Czechia
  • Lithuania
05101520199219982004

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre in Czechia, a difference of 0.34 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 92nd and Lithuania ranks 90th of 169 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 7.03 current US$ per square kilometre 6.34 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6894 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 6.13 current US$ per square kilometre 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2315 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Czechia or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre in Czechia as of 2004.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Czechia and Lithuania?
0.34 current US$ per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?
12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
How do Czechia and Lithuania rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Czechia ranks 92nd and Lithuania ranks 90th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Lithuania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/lithuania/">Czechia vs Lithuania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.