Egypt vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Egypt
1.42 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Zimbabwe
1.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Egypt rank
122nd
Zimbabwe rank
123rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Egypt
  • Zimbabwe
02468196919882008

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.02 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 169 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5425 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0517 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4908 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5805 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2.71 current US$ per square kilometre 5.19 current US$ per square kilometre 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Egypt or Zimbabwe?
Egypt, at 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Egypt and Zimbabwe?
0.02 current US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Zimbabwe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2008.
How do Egypt and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Egypt ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 123rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/zimbabwe/">Egypt vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.