Estonia vs Guatemala: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Estonia
6.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Guatemala
5.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Estonia rank
83rd
Guatemala rank
86th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Estonia
  • Guatemala
0510152025196919882008

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 6.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.82 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guatemala ahead.

Estonia ranks 83rd and Guatemala ranks 86th of 169 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 5.04 current US$ per square kilometre 8.46 current US$ per square kilometre 3.41 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 6.13 current US$ per square kilometre 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre 3.91 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Estonia or Guatemala?
Estonia, at 6.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2004.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Estonia and Guatemala?
0.82 current US$ per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Guatemala?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do Estonia and Guatemala rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Estonia ranks 83rd and Guatemala ranks 86th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Guatemala: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/estonia/guatemala/">Estonia vs Guatemala: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.