Estonia vs Israel: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square
Estonia
6.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Israel
6.47 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Estonia rank
83rd
Israel rank
84th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time
- Estonia
- Israel
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 6.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.14 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Israel ahead.
Estonia ranks 83rd and Israel ranks 84th of 169 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Estonia or Israel?
- Estonia, at 6.61 current US$ per square kilometre against 6.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Israel as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Estonia and Israel?
- 0.14 current US$ per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Israel?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1996.
- How do Estonia and Israel rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Estonia ranks 83rd and Israel ranks 84th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.