Eswatini vs East Timor: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square
Eswatini
31.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
East Timor
34.3 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Eswatini rank
38th
East Timor rank
35th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current) … UNTA square over time
- Eswatini
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 34.3 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.98 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 38th and East Timor ranks 35th of 169 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Eswatini or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 34.3 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.98 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Eswatini and East Timor?
- 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and East Timor?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2008.
- How do Eswatini and East Timor rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Eswatini ranks 38th and East Timor ranks 35th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.