Euro area vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Euro area
0.8147 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Sao Tome and Principe
208.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Euro area rank
20th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
17th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Euro area
  • Sao Tome and Principe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019892008

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 208.33 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8147 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area, a difference of 207.52 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 255.7 times Euro area's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Euro area ranks 20th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 17th of 47 groups.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Euro area Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1264 current US$ per square kilometre 213.54 current US$ per square kilometre 213.42 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.1903 current US$ per square kilometre 464.58 current US$ per square kilometre 464.39 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.6845 current US$ per square kilometre 929.17 current US$ per square kilometre 928.48 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.7785 current US$ per square kilometre 1,079 current US$ per square kilometre 1,078 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Euro area or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 208.33 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8147 current US$ per square kilometre in Euro area as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Euro area and Sao Tome and Principe?
207.52 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Sao Tome and Principe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2004.
How do Euro area and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Euro area ranks 20th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 17th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Euro area vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/euro-area/sao-tome-and-principe/">Euro area vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.