Georgia vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Georgia
10.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Malawi
10.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Georgia rank
62nd
Malawi rank
63rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Georgia
  • Malawi
0102030196919882008

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.61 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.18 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.

Georgia ranks 62nd and Malawi ranks 63rd of 169 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 4.84 current US$ per square kilometre 16.6 current US$ per square kilometre 11.76 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 12.81 current US$ per square kilometre 18.22 current US$ per square kilometre 5.41 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Georgia or Malawi?
Georgia, at 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.61 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Georgia and Malawi?
0.18 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malawi?
17 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2008.
How do Georgia and Malawi rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Georgia ranks 62nd and Malawi ranks 63rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/malawi/">Georgia vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.