Hong Kong, China vs Lesotho: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square

Hong Kong, China
28.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Lesotho
21.08 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Hong Kong, China rank
43rd
Lesotho rank
46th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Lesotho
050100150196919882008

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 21.08 current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 7.49 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.4 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd and Lesotho ranks 46th of 169 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre 7.17 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s 51.4 current US$ per square kilometre 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre 46.26 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 59.38 current US$ per square kilometre 29.17 current US$ per square kilometre 30.21 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 92.89 current US$ per square kilometre 46.02 current US$ per square kilometre 46.87 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Hong Kong, China or Lesotho?
Hong Kong, China, at 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre against 21.08 current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 1996.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Hong Kong, China and Lesotho?
7.49 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Lesotho?
27 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Lesotho rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd and Lesotho ranks 46th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Lesotho: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/lesotho/">Hong Kong, China vs Lesotho: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 7,436 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.