Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square
Hong Kong, China
28.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Rwanda
31.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2008
Hong Kong, China rank
43rd
Rwanda rank
40th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 31.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 40th of 169 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.1 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1970s | 51.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.47 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1980s | 59.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.96 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 92.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 66.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.35 current US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square, Hong Kong, China or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 31.21 current US$ per square kilometre against 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square between Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
- 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 1996.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Rwanda rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd and Rwanda ranks 40th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.